The 97 UCP 600 and ISBP 821 checks we run
All 97 checks the engine runs on a Letter of Credit presentation, with the UCP 600 article, ISBP 821 practice or SWIFT field each comes from — plus any additional conditions your own credit sets out in field 47A, which are examined as well and cannot be listed in advance. Findings are graded blocker, major, minor or advisory.
Credit structure and undertaking — UCP 600 Articles 1 to 16
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Scope of the rules | Art. 1 |
| Credits versus contracts | Art. 4 |
| Documents versus goods, services or performance | Art. 5 |
| Availability and expiry | Art. 6 |
| Place of presentation | Art. 6 |
| Issuing bank undertaking | Art. 7 |
| Advising bank | Art. 9 |
| Complying presentation | Art. 15 |
| Discrepant documents, waiver and notice | Art. 16 |
| LC field completeness (structural) | structural |
Examination rules — UCP 600 Articles 14 and 17
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Standard for examination — data consistency | Art. 14 |
| 21-day presentation period | Art. 14(c) |
| Original documents and copies | Art. 17 |
| Shipper or consignor need not be the beneficiary | Art. 14(k) |
| Other documents required by the credit | Art. 14(f) |
| Number of originals and copies presented | Field 46A |
| Every message of the credit presented — MT700 and its MT701 continuation | Field 27 |
Commercial documents
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Commercial invoice | Art. 18 |
| Insurance documents and cover | Art. 28 |
| Insurance amount and percentage of cover | Art. 28(f) |
| Packing list | practice |
| Certificate of origin | practice |
| Bank presentation letter | practice |
| Invoice issued by the beneficiary, addressed to the applicant | Art. 18(a) |
| Packing list arithmetic — weights, quantities and totals | practice |
| Packing list against the documents required | Field 46A |
| Draft or bill of exchange | Field 42C |
| Invoice arithmetic — line totals, subtotal and the amount claimed | Art. 18 · Art. 14(d) |
| References and certification the credit requires on the invoice | Fields 46A / 47A |
| Brand, make or mark named in the credit shown on the invoice | Art. 18(c) · ISBP 821 |
| Charges billed on the invoice against the credit's charges instruction | Field 71 |
| Certificate of origin — identity, title and completeness | ISBP 821 L1–L2 |
| Certificate of origin against the form, language and wording the credit stipulates | Fields 46A / 47A |
| Certificate of origin — issuing authority and signature | ISBP 821 L1 · L3 |
| Certificate of origin — the country of origin certified | ISBP 821 L7 |
| Certificate of origin — the goods it certifies and any schedule it refers to | ISBP 821 L1 · L4 |
| Certificate of origin — exporter, consignor and consignee | ISBP 821 L5–L6 |
| Certificate of origin — invoice references, dates and shipment data | ISBP 821 L8 |
| Certificate of origin against the other documents presented | Art. 14(a) · Art. 14(d) |
Transport documents — UCP 600 Articles 19 to 27
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Transport document present for the mode of carriage | Arts. 19–25 |
| Multimodal or combined transport document | Art. 19 |
| Bill of lading | Art. 20 |
| Non-negotiable sea waybill | Art. 21 |
| Charter party bill of lading | Art. 22 |
| Air transport document | Art. 23 |
| Air waybill — date of issue or the actual date of shipment | Art. 23(a)(iii) · ISBP 821 H8 |
| Air waybill — airport of departure and of destination | Art. 23(a)(iv) · ISBP 821 H9 |
| Air waybill — the original for the consignor or shipper | Art. 23(a)(v) · ISBP 821 H12 |
| Air waybill — transhipment and the one-air-waybill exception | Art. 23(b)–(c) |
| Air waybill against the documents required | Fields 46A/47A |
| Road, rail or inland waterway transport documents | Art. 24 |
| Courier receipt, post receipt or certificate of posting | Art. 25 |
| Carrier identified and the document signed | Arts. 19–20 |
| Clean transport document — no adverse clause | Art. 27 |
| On deck, shipper’s load and count, and charges | Art. 26 |
| Charter party indication on the bill of lading | Art. 20 |
| Multimodal document covering the whole carriage | Art. 19 |
| Bill of lading against the documents required | Field 46A |
| Consignee against the credit’s instructions | Field 46A |
| Notify party against the credit’s instructions | Field 46A |
| Applicant details on the transport document | practice |
| Freight terms on the transport document | practice |
| Vessel the credit names shown on the transport document | Field 46A · Art. 14(d) |
Amounts, quantities and drawings — UCP 600 Articles 29 to 32
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Extension of expiry date or last day for presentation | Art. 29 |
| Tolerance in credit amount, quantity and unit prices | Art. 30 |
| Partial drawings or shipments | Art. 31 |
| Instalment drawings or shipments | Art. 32 |
| Quantity and unit price against the credit | Art. 30 |
| Additional amounts covered | Field 39C |
Disclaimers, transfer and assignment — UCP 600 Articles 34 to 39
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Disclaimer on effectiveness of documents | Art. 34 |
| Disclaimer on transmission and translation | Art. 35 |
| Force majeure | Art. 36 |
| Acts of an instructed party | Art. 37 |
| Transferable credits | Art. 38 |
| Assignment of proceeds | Art. 39 |
| Third-party or transferred-credit invoice issuer | Art. 38 · Field 47A |
ISBP 821 practice and cross-document consistency
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Cross-document consistency | ISBP 821 |
| Date consistency across the set | ISBP 821 |
| Currency consistency | ISBP 821 |
| Goods description corresponds to the credit | ISBP 821 |
| Incoterm consistency | ISBP 821 |
| Consignee and notify party details | ISBP 821 |
| On-board notation | ISBP 821 |
| Signatures and stamps | ISBP 821 |
| Country of origin stated consistently | ISBP 821 |
| Payment tenor matches the credit | ISBP 821 |
| Ports and places against the credit | ISBP 821 |
| Currency used consistently within a document | ISBP 821 |
| Cargo data agrees across the set | ISBP 821 |
| Routing and place identity | ISBP 821 |
| Corrections and alterations | ISBP 821 |
| Goods description across the documents | Art. 14(e) · ISBP 821 |
Document reading and screening
These do not come from UCP 600 or ISBP 821. They report on how well the set could be read and on what the stated route and places look like — a presentation examined from a poor scan is not the same evidence as one examined from clean text, and the report says so.
| Check | Reference |
|---|---|
| Reading confidence on scanned documents | reading |
| Date reading and format ambiguity | reading |
| Route and place screening | screening |
| Duplicate documents in the presentation | screening |
| Page continuity — every page of each document present | reading |
Common questions
What counts as a discrepancy under UCP 600?
A discrepancy is any point where the documents presented do not comply with the terms of the credit, the applicable UCP 600 articles, or international standard banking practice. Under Article 14, banks examine documents on their face to decide whether they appear to constitute a complying presentation, and data in a document must not conflict with data in any other stipulated document or with the credit itself. Common examples are an invoice amount exceeding the credit amount, a goods description that does not correspond to the credit, a presentation made after the 21-day period in Article 14(c), a missing on-board notation, and inconsistent dates or currencies across documents.
What is ISBP 821?
ISBP 821 is the International Chamber of Commerce publication International Standard Banking Practice for the Examination of Documents under UCP 600. It does not replace UCP 600; it explains how the articles are applied in day-to-day document examination — how goods descriptions are read, how dates and signatures are treated, and how consignee and notify details on transport documents are checked.
Why do banks reject letters of credit?
Banks do not reject the credit itself; they refuse the presentation of documents made under it. The refusal is for discrepancies found on examination — documents that conflict with each other or with the credit, documents presented after the expiry or presentation period, invoices drawn for more than the credit permits, transport documents missing required notations, or insurance cover below the required percentage. Industry estimates commonly put the first-presentation discrepancy rate in the region of 70 to 80 percent, which is why a pre-submission check matters.
How are findings graded?
Each finding is graded blocker (a discrepancy a bank would be entitled to refuse on), major (a material inconsistency that commonly draws a refusal notice under Article 16), minor (a smaller defect that may or may not be raised), or advisory (not a discrepancy, but worth knowing before presenting).
Run these checks on one real presentation, free
Upload one Letter of Credit set and get the full findings report back in minutes. No sign-up wall.